Chatting— Part 1 Informe

Sugerencia: Be more concise and direct. Start with a clear topic sentence, reduce hesitations, and use coherent linking to explain when you prefer chatting versus being alone. Limit to 2–4 sentences and avoid repetition.

Ejemplo: I do enjoy chatting with friends, especially when we discuss travel and life experiences. However, if the conversation isn’t meaningful, I prefer to spend quiet time alone to recharge.

Sugerencia: Answer directly then give specific details. Avoid vague phrasing and repetitions. Use linking words (for example, especially, because) and keep to 2–4 sentences with clear verbs and tenses.

Ejemplo: We usually talk about life experiences and how to handle challenges. For example, we often discuss career choices in Canada and share practical advice about finding work and adapting to a new culture.

Sugerencia: Give a clear preference and explain briefly with supporting reasons. Remove hesitations and redundant phrases. Use linking words like 'because' or 'so' to connect ideas and provide one concrete benefit of group or one-to-one chats.

Ejemplo: It depends, but I prefer group conversations because you hear many perspectives. For instance, when we discuss career challenges, different friends offer practical tips and new ideas.

Sugerencia: State your preference clearly and support it with concise reasons and one example. Reduce repetition and correct minor grammar (e.g., 'able to fake' -> 'able to fake'). Keep it to 2–3 sentences for clarity.

Ejemplo: I prefer face-to-face communication because I can tell whether someone is genuinely interested. On social media people can easily misrepresent their feelings, so personal meetings feel more trustworthy.

Sugerencia: Begin with a clear topic sentence, then briefly describe the incident with clear sequence words (e.g., 'once', 'afterwards') and correct tense. Avoid long, confusing descriptions—focus on cause and result in 2–3 sentences.

Ejemplo: I rarely argue with friends. Once at my previous job I argued with a close friend about a mutual acquaintance, which caused a misunderstanding and eventually ended the friendship.

× Honestly, I love traveling with my friends or to talk about different kind of life experiences if it's meant to be, but if it's uh, really not uh, really that important, I normally want to spend quality time with myself instead of talking with them.

✓ Honestly, I love traveling with my friends or talking about different kinds of life experiences if it's meant to be, but if it's not really that important, I normally want to spend quality time by myself instead of talking with them.

'different kind' should be 'different kinds' because 'kinds' agrees in number with 'different'; 'to talk' following 'love' should be the gerund 'talking' for parallel structure; 'uh, really not uh, really that important' is redundant and should be simplified to 'not really that important'; 'spend quality time with myself' is unnatural—use 'spend quality time by myself' or 'spend quality time alone'. Suggestion: use parallel gerunds after verbs of preference, ensure noun number agreement, remove filler words and use natural collocations.

× I remember one time that we talk about life experiences and how to deal with different challenges in this life, Especially we talk about professional career that we need to undertake, especially in this country, Canada, and I miss this moment of talk and hopefully it will happen again if we met each other.

✓ I remember one time when we talked about life experiences and how to deal with different challenges in life. Especially, we talked about professional careers that we needed to pursue in this country, Canada, and I miss that conversation; hopefully it will happen again if we meet each other.

The sentence refers to a past event so verbs should be in the past tense: 'talk' -> 'talked'; 'we need' -> 'we needed' to match the past context; 'one time that' should be 'one time when' for correct clause use; 'professional career' is better as plural 'professional careers' or 'a professional career' depending on meaning; 'I miss this moment of talk' should be 'I miss that conversation'; 'if we met each other' should be 'if we meet each other' to express a real future possibility (present tense in conditional). Suggestion: keep tense consistent for past narration and use present simple in conditional clauses for future-factual meaning.

× I think it depends on the circumstances, but I think it's uh, but I prepared to talk with a group of people.

✓ I think it depends on the circumstances, but I'm prepared to talk with a group of people.

'but I prepared' wrongly uses past form 'prepared' where the present-state 'I'm prepared' (or 'I am prepared') is appropriate to describe current willingness. Also remove redundant 'I think it's uh, but' and filler 'uh'. Suggestion: use present simple or present participle forms to describe current states and avoid filler words.

× So we share different kinds of views as well as perspective in our life as well as challenges.

✓ So we share different kinds of views and perspectives on our lives and challenges.

Use plural 'perspectives' to match 'different kinds'; 'in our life' should be 'on our lives' or 'in our lives'; using 'as well as' twice is redundant—use 'and' to join items. Suggestion: ensure parallel plural forms and use concise connectors.

× So they, so there's some people also they can share their point of view or what they are trying to.

✓ Some people can also share their points of view or explain what they are trying to say.

The original is disfluent and contains repeated subjects ('they, so there's some people also they'). Remove redundancy and complete the clause: 'what they are trying to' is incomplete—add 'say' or 'express'. Use plural 'points of view' for consistency. Suggestion: avoid repeated subject phrases and complete verbs in clauses.

× I think I prefer the talking face to face because I will know the the genuine interest of a specific person if it's real or not.

✓ I think I prefer talking face to face because I can tell whether a person's interest is genuine or not.

'the talking' is incorrect; use gerund 'talking' without 'the'. 'I will know the the genuine interest of a specific person' is awkward—'I can tell whether a person's interest is genuine' is natural. Remove duplicate 'the the'. Use 'can tell' for ability rather than 'will know' which implies future certainty. Suggestion: use natural verb phrases like 'tell whether' and avoid unnecessary articles.

× Compared to social media, they can able to to fake their the feelings as well as what they're trying to communicate.

✓ Compared to social media, people can fake their feelings and what they're trying to communicate.

'they can able to to fake' mixes modal and ability phrases incorrectly—use either 'can fake' or 'are able to fake'. Remove duplicate 'to' and extra 'the'. Starting the sentence 'Compared to social media' should refer to 'people' or 'users' rather than 'social media' itself. Suggestion: use correct modal + verb pattern and ensure pronouns refer clearly to people, not platforms.

× So I prepared to to talk personally.

✓ So I'm prepared to talk personally.

Again 'prepared' is used incorrectly in past form; for current willingness use 'I'm prepared' or 'I prefer to talk personally'. Remove duplicate 'to'. Suggestion: use present state constructions for current preferences and avoid repeated words.

× I don't normally argue with my friends but I remember one time that I have argued with my long term friends at my previous work.

✓ I don't normally argue with my friends, but I remember one time when I argued with my long-term friends at my previous workplace.

Mixing present perfect 'have argued' with past time reference 'one time' is incorrect; use simple past 'argued'. 'long term friends' should be hyphenated 'long-term friends' and 'previous work' is better as 'previous workplace'. Use 'when' instead of 'that' for time clauses. Suggestion: use simple past for specific past events and correct compound adjectives and nouns.

× We argue about the specific person that is also their common friends and we had under misunderstand to each other and now we're we're no longer friends because of that incident.

✓ We argued about a specific person who was also a mutual friend, and we had a misunderstanding with each other; now we are no longer friends because of that incident.

Use simple past 'argued' for the past event. 'that is also their common friends' is ungrammatical—use 'who was also a mutual friend'. 'we had under misunderstand to each other' is incorrect phrasing; use 'we had a misunderstanding with each other' or 'we misunderstood each other'. Remove duplicate 'we're we're'. Suggestion: use clear relative clauses ('who' for people), correct collocations ('mutual friend', 'had a misunderstanding'), and avoid duplicated words.