Bike— Part 1 採点レポート

提案: Give a full, natural response with a topic sentence and supporting details. Mention whether you owned or used a bike, how often you rode it, where you rode it, and a brief reason or memory to make the answer specific. Keep it concise (no more than 5 sentences) and use linking words such as "and" or "because."

例: Yes, I did have a bike when I was a child. I used it almost every day to ride around my neighborhood and to visit my friends, and I remember practicing tricks in the park. Because my parents wanted me to be active, they bought me a sturdy mountain bike that lasted for several years.

提案: Provide a direct opinion with reasons and at least one specific example or contrast. Use linking words like "however," "because," or "for example" to make your answer coherent. Aim for 2–4 sentences to sound natural and informative.

例: I don't think bikes are very popular in my country because most people prefer cars for commuting due to long distances and limited cycling infrastructure. However, cycling is becoming more common in some cities for leisure and exercise, especially among young people who join weekend group rides.

× Student: Yes.

✓ Student: Yes, I did.

The response 'Yes.' is a fragment that lacks an explicit verb; in a question asking about past possession ('Did you have a bike when you were a child?') a full answer should include the auxiliary verb to match the question's tense. Use 'Yes, I did.' to provide a complete sentence that repeats the auxiliary 'did' for clarity and correctness.

× Student: No.

✓ Student: No, I don't think so.

The one-word reply 'No.' is a fragment and does not mirror the tense of the question 'Do you think bikes are popular in your country?' A complete response should include the auxiliary verb 'do' in the present tense, e.g., 'No, I don't think so.' This gives a grammatical full sentence and explicitly shows disagreement with the proposition.