Part 1
試験官
Did you have a bike when you were a child?
受験者
Yes, I had when I was a child. I really loved the styling because in my country the roads are so safe and everyone love bikes and respect of sailings.
試験官
Do you think bikes are popular in your country?
受験者
Not really because in my country the roads are so unsafe for sailings bikers, you know? Uh, everyone needs a safe roads right?
Did you have a bike when you were a child?
スコア: 60.0提案: Cevap açık ancak dilbilgisi ve mantık hataları var. Öncelikle “I had when I was a child” yerine “I had one when I was a child” denmeli. “Styling” yerine “style” daha doğal olur. Ayrıca “respect of sailings” ifadesi anlamsız; muhtemelen ‘respect for cyclists’ veya ‘respect for riders’ demek istediniz. Cümleleri bağlamak için bağlaçlar kullanın ve bir veya iki kısa destekleyici detay ekleyin. Maksimum 3-4 cümle ile net ifade edin.
例: Yes, I had a bike when I was a child. I really liked its style because it was colourful and lightweight. Also, in my hometown people respected cyclists and the roads were relatively safe, so I felt comfortable riding it often.
Do you think bikes are popular in your country?
スコア: 55.0提案: Cevap doğrudan ama tekrarlar ve yanlış kelime kullanımı var. “Sailings bikers” yerine “cycling” veya “cyclists” kullanılmalı. Dilbilgisi açısından “a safe roads” yanlış; doğru kullanım “safe roads” veya “a safe road network” olmalı. Cevabı desteklemek için bir neden ve kısa örnek verin; bağlaçlarla cümleleri akıcı hale getirin. 2-3 kısa cümle yeterli.
例: Not really. Cycling isn’t very popular because many roads are unsafe for cyclists, especially in cities. For example, there are few dedicated bike lanes and drivers often ignore cyclists, so people prefer using cars.
× Yes, I had when I was a child.
✓ Yes, I did when I was a child.
The student used the past simple auxiliary incorrectly. In short answers to 'Did you have...?' we use 'Yes, I did' not 'Yes, I had'. Use 'did' for past simple questions; 'had' is the main verb form, not the short response. Suggestion: answer with 'Yes, I did' or 'Yes, I had a bike.'
× I really loved the styling because in my country the roads are so safe and everyone love bikes and respect of sailings.
✓ I really loved the styling because in my country the roads are so safe and everyone loves bikes and respects cyclists.
Multiple preposition and word choice issues: 'everyone love' requires third person singular agreement (everyone loves). 'respect of sailings' is ungrammatical; likely meant 'respects cyclists' or 'respects cycling'. 'Cyclists' is the correct noun for people who ride bikes. Also 'styling' is acceptable but could be 'the style'. Suggestion: use third-person singular 'loves' and correct noun 'cyclists' or 'cycling'.
× Not really because in my country the roads are so unsafe for sailings bikers, you know?
✓ Not really, because in my country the roads are so unsafe for cyclists, you know?
The phrase 'sailings bikers' is incorrect. 'Cyclists' is the appropriate noun for people who ride bikes. 'Unsafe for cyclists' uses the correct preposition and noun. Suggestion: replace 'sailings bikers' with 'cyclists' or 'people who cycle'.
× Uh, everyone needs a safe roads right?
✓ Uh, everyone needs safe roads, right?
Mismatch between 'everyone' (singular) and plural noun with article: 'a safe roads' is incorrect because 'a' requires a singular noun. Either use 'a safe road' or plural without 'a': 'safe roads'. Suggestion: remove 'a' to match plural 'roads' or change to 'a safe road' if meaning one road.