Bike— Part 1 採点レポート

提案: Your response simply repeated the examiner's question, which does not answer it. For a better score, give a direct topic sentence stating whether you had a bike, then add one or two specific supporting details (how old you were, who gave it to you, where you rode it, or a brief memory). Keep answers natural, concise (no more than 5 sentences), and use linking words like “and” or “when” to connect ideas.

例: Yes, I had a bike when I was a child. I got it for my seventh birthday, and I used to ride it around the neighborhood every afternoon. It helped me learn balance and gave me a sense of freedom.

提案: Your answer directly addresses the question but is brief and lacks supporting details. Improve by giving specific reasons, comparisons, or examples to justify your opinion and use linking words (for example, “because,” “however,” or “for instance”). Keep it natural and avoid one-word or one-sentence replies.

例: No, I don't think bikes are very popular in my country because most people prefer cars for convenience and status. For example, the city has limited bike lanes, so riding can be dangerous, and public transport or driving is usually faster.

× Did you have a bike when you were a child?

✓ I had a bike when I was a child.

The student repeated the examiner's question instead of answering. This is a sentence structure error (ID 26). Use a declarative past-tense sentence to answer a past-time question. 'Did you have' is the question form; the correct answer is 'I had' (simple past). Also include the subject 'I'.

× No, I don't think bikes are popular in my country.

✓ No, I don't think bicycles are very popular in my country.

The sentence is grammatically acceptable, but 'bikes' is informal; 'bicycles' is more neutral. This falls under present tense/use and word choice (ID 6). To improve clarity, add an adverb such as 'very' if the speaker means limited popularity. Maintain present simple for general truths: 'I don't think bicycles are very popular in my country.'