Bike— Part 1 採点レポート

提案: Improve grammar and naturalness. Use correct past simple negative form (“did not have”) and keep the answer concise with a clear topic sentence. You can add one brief reason or memory to enrich the response, using a linking word if needed. Avoid extra words and ensure sentence count remains under five.

例: No, I did not have a bike when I was a child. However, I often borrowed my neighbour’s bike to ride to school, which was about a ten-minute ride.

提案: Work on grammar, sentence structure and coherence. Begin with a clear topic sentence, then add specific supporting details using linking words (for example, “because” or “therefore”). Avoid filler phrases like “that's it” and redundant words. Use plural/singular forms correctly and choose natural collocations (e.g., “bicycles are popular,” “more affordable”).

例: Yes, bicycles are quite popular in my country because they are much more affordable than cars. For example, many families use them for short trips to the market or for children to go to school, so they remain a common mode of transport.

× No, I did not had a bike when I was a child.

✓ No, I did not have a bike when I was a child.

The sentence uses 'did' which is the past tense auxiliary, so the main verb must be in its base form. 'Had' is the past form and should not follow 'did'. Use 'have' after 'did not'. Suggestion: use 'I did not have' or contracted 'I didn't have'.

× I believe bicycle popular in my country since these are cheaper than cars and usually family or parents could easily afford it, but the moreover it's an affordable option. That's it.

✓ I believe bicycles are popular in my country because they are cheaper than cars and families can usually afford them; moreover, they are an affordable option.

This sentence has multiple structure and grammar issues: missing plural and verb (use 'bicycles are'), incorrect conjunctions ('since' can mean 'because' but sounds formal; 'because' is clearer), incorrect demonstrative/pronoun agreement ('these' should refer to bicycles—use 'they' or 'them'), subject-verb agreement ('family or parents could' should be 'families can' for general present meaning), incorrect modal choice ('could' implies possibility rather than general ability), misplaced 'moreover' and punctuation. Suggestions: make the subject plural 'bicycles', use present simple for general facts ('are popular','are cheaper','can afford'), use 'them' for objects, and place 'moreover' at clause start with proper punctuation.