Part 1
Examinador
Did you have a bike when you were a child?
Candidato
Yes, I did have a bike when I was cha when I was a child. It was actually a bike that had four wheels, so it was a typical 2 wheel bike with two small wheels on the back which made it easier for me to balance and after that I.
Examinador
Do you think bikes are popular in your country?
Candidato
I would say not as popular as other countries such as the Netherlands, but I do see, uh, a small proportion of people, uh, riding bikes when they go from school to their house. So I guess in a sense it's popular, but not the extent of other countries.
Did you have a bike when you were a child?
Pontuação: 56.0Sugestão: 발음과 문장 완결성을 개선하세요. 답변 초반에 'when I was cha'처럼 말이 끊기고 반복되는 실수가 있습니다. 먼저 주제문(예: Yes, I did.)으로 바로 응답한 후, 한두 개의 구체적 세부사항을 간결하게 덧붙이세요. 문장을 끝까지 말하고 불필요한 반복(예: 'when I was…')을 제거하세요. 연결어(for example, because, so)를 사용해 이유와 결과를 논리적으로 연결하고, 문장 수를 3~4문장으로 유지하세요.
Exemplo: Yes, I did. When I was a child I had a small bike with two training wheels at the back, which made it much easier for me to balance. Because of those wheels, I learned to ride confidently and started cycling around the neighborhood every weekend. Overall, it was a memorable part of my childhood.
Do you think bikes are popular in your country?
Pontuação: 68.0Sugestão: 어휘 선택과 유창성을 개선하세요. 'uh' 같은 불필요한 음성 채우기를 줄이고 더 명확한 연결어를 사용해 의견을 체계적으로 제시하세요. 비교할 때 구체적인 근거(예: 인프라 부족, 대중교통 선호)를 한두 문장으로 추가하면 설득력이 높아집니다. 문장 길이를 2~4문장으로 유지하고, 'in a sense' 같은 모호한 표현 대신 확실한 평가 표현을 사용하세요.
Exemplo: I would say bicycles are less popular in my country than in places like the Netherlands. One reason is the lack of safe cycling infrastructure, so many people prefer cars or public transport. However, cycling is common among students and some commuters in urban areas, especially for short trips.
× Yes, I did have a bike when I was cha when I was a child.
✓ Yes, I did have a bike when I was a child.
The original sentence includes a repeated fragment 'when I was cha' which is likely a spoken slip and results in a sentence structure error (type 26). Remove the repeated fragment to produce a complete past-tense clause. Suggestion: read the sentence slowly and finish each clause before starting the next to avoid accidental repetition.
× It was actually a bike that had four wheels, so it was a typical 2 wheel bike with two small wheels on the back which made it easier for me to balance and after that I.
✓ It was actually a bike that had four wheels, a typical two-wheel bike with two small wheels on the back, which made it easier for me to balance, and after that I stopped using the training wheels.
The original sentence is a run-on and ends with an unfinished fragment 'and after that I.' This is a sentence structure error (type 26). Complete the thought by specifying what happened after (e.g., 'stopped using the training wheels') and clarify '2 wheel' as 'two-wheel'. Also add commas to separate clauses. Suggestion: plan the end of the sentence before speaking and use cohesive phrases to finish ideas.
× I would say not as popular as other countries such as the Netherlands, but I do see, uh, a small proportion of people, uh, riding bikes when they go from school to their house.
✓ I would say they are not as popular as in other countries such as the Netherlands, but I do see a small proportion of people riding bikes when they go from school to their homes.
Errors include missing subject and inappropriate article/preposition use: 'not as popular as other countries' lacks a clear subject and should use 'they are not as popular as in other countries' (type 22 and 17). 'from school to their house' is awkward; plural 'homes' fits general statement (type 1/14). Remove filler 'uh' for clarity. Suggestion: include the subject (they) and use 'in other countries' for comparison; use 'homes' when speaking generally.
× So I guess in a sense it's popular, but not the extent of other countries.
✓ So I guess in a sense it's popular, but not to the same extent as in other countries.
The phrase 'not the extent of other countries' is unclear and omits necessary comparative structure; this is an incorrect use of phrasing/pronoun reference (type 12 and 26). Use 'not to the same extent as in other countries' to form a proper comparison. Suggestion: use standard comparative connectors like 'to the same extent as' when comparing prevalence between places.