Part 1
考官
Did you have a bike when you were a child?
考生
No I haven't. The my house was near a river so it didn't have any road to ride a bike.
考官
Do you think bikes are popular in your country?
考生
Yes, I think because there's like a lot of people riding bike around the park and they're really having fun with it.
Did you have a bike when you were a child?
分數: 55.0建議: คำแนะนำ: ปรับแกรมมาร์และความชัดเจนของประโยค ควรใช้อดีตกาลเมื่อพูดถึงอดีตและหลีกเลี่ยงคำที่ซ้ำซ้อนหรือคำผิด เช่น 'No, I didn't' และ 'my house' ให้ครบถ้วน นอกจากนี้ควรขยายรายละเอียดเล็กน้อยโดยใช้คำเชื่อมที่เหมาะสม เช่น 'because' หรือ 'so' เพื่อให้เหตุผลชัดเจนขึ้น
範例: No, I didn’t. My house was next to a river, so there weren’t any proper roads where I could ride a bike. As a result, I usually walked or took a bus instead.
Do you think bikes are popular in your country?
分數: 65.0建議: คำแนะนำ: ปรับสำนวนให้เป็นทางการขึ้นและลดคำอุปสรรค (filler words) เช่น 'like' ใช้โครงสร้างที่ชัดเจนและคำเชื่อม เช่น 'for example' หรือ 'for instance' เพื่อให้รายละเอียดเฉพาะเจาะจงขึ้น อาจอธิบายเหตุผลเพิ่มเติม เช่น สุขภาพ การเดินทาง หรือกิจกรรมยามว่าง
範例: Yes, I think so. For example, many people ride bicycles in the parks for exercise and leisure, and in some cities bikes are also a common way to commute to work.
× No I haven't.
✓ No, I didn't.
The question asks about possession in the past ('Did you have a bike when you were a child?'), so the correct auxiliary is 'did' and the main verb is 'have' in base form. 'Haven't' is present perfect and doesn't match the simple past context. Use 'No, I didn't' to mean 'I did not have one.' Suggestions: use simple past with 'did' for past possession questions; include a comma after 'No.'
× The my house was near a river so it didn't have any road to ride a bike.
✓ My house was near a river, so there wasn't any road to ride a bike.
This sentence has multiple issues: an extra definite article 'The' before 'my house' is wrong (possessive already specifies), and 'it didn't have any road' is awkward because 'it' unclear and 'have a road' is unnatural. Also, the existence of a road is better expressed with 'there was/there wasn't'. Use past simple 'was' for location and 'wasn't' for lack of roads. Suggestions: remove the extra 'The', use 'there wasn't any road' or 'there weren't any roads', and join clauses with a comma before 'so.'
× Yes, I think because there's like a lot of people riding bike around the park and they're really having fun with it.
✓ Yes, I think so because there are a lot of people riding bikes around the park, and they're really enjoying it.
Several issues: 'there's' is singular contraction for 'there is' but should be plural 'there are' to agree with 'a lot of people'; 'riding bike' needs plural 'bikes' or 'riding their bikes'; 'having fun with it' is awkward—use 'enjoying it' or 'having fun' without 'with it'. Also add 'so' after 'think' for natural response. Suggestions: use 'there are' for plural existence, pluralize 'bike' to 'bikes', and use 'enjoying it' or 'having fun' to describe activity.