自行车— Part 1 評分報告

建議: Vos réponses sont naturelles mais trop brèves et incluent une question redondante à l’examinateur (évitez de renvoyer la question). Donnez une phrase principale claire puis ajoutez 1–2 détails précis (âge, lieu, difficulté, souvenir) en utilisant des mots de liaison simples (for example, when, so, because). Évitez les répétitions et respectez la limite de 5 phrases.

範例: Yes, I did. I learned to ride a bike with my father when I was about six years old. At first I was scared, but he taught me how to balance and pedal until I felt confident. After a few weeks I could ride around the park by myself.

建議: La réponse est compréhensible mais confuse et contient des répétitions et des hésitations. Commencez par une affirmation claire, puis expliquez brièvement pourquoi avec un ou deux exemples concrets (infrastructure, culture, météo). Utilisez des mots de liaison (because, for example, therefore) et corrigez les erreurs grammaticales (e.g. "France" n’a pas besoin d’être répétée). Ne vous excusez pas pour de petites erreurs en test.

範例: Yes, they are very popular in France because many cities have extensive bike lanes and pedestrian areas. For example, in my town there are dedicated cycling paths that make biking safe and convenient. As a result, many people use bikes for daily travel and leisure.

× I learned with my father when I was a child.

✓ I learned to ride a bike with my father when I was a child.

The original sentence omits the object and verb needed to clarify what was learned. In English we 'learn to ride (a bike)' or 'learn how to ride (a bike)'. Add 'to ride a bike' for clarity and use 'with my father' to indicate who taught you. Suggestion: Use 'learned to ride a bike' or 'learned how to ride a bike' when describing learning that skill.

× Yes they are.

✓ Yes, they are.

This is a punctuation/structure issue: a comma after 'Yes' is standard in writing to separate the interjection from the clause. Add a comma to make the sentence more natural and correct in written English.

× They are very popular in my country France, which is France because we have big pedestrian Rd. that can be practiced with a road with a bike. Sorry.

✓ They are very popular in my country, France, because we have large pedestrian roads and bike lanes where people can ride a bicycle.

The original sentence has multiple problems: missing commas around the appositive 'France'; awkward repetition 'which is France because'; incorrect abbreviation 'Rd.'; incorrect word choice 'practiced with a road with a bike.' Correct by using commas for apposition, removing redundancy, using 'large' instead of 'big' for roads, and stating 'pedestrian roads and bike lanes' or 'paths where people can ride a bicycle.' Also replace informal 'Sorry.' with nothing in a corrected response. Suggestion: Use 'my country, France,' and clearly state the infrastructure: 'we have pedestrian paths and bike lanes where people can ride a bicycle.'